Envelope Instagram Facebook Youtube Linkedin
MUST University Logo
STUDENT LOGIN
REQUEST INFO
MUST University

MUST Reviews
 Scientific Journal

ISSN 2644-2450 Library of Congress, Washington, DC

Explore Our Latest Release!

MUST Review Business

This edition explores how technology, management, innovation, and human-centered practices are reshaping organizations, examining the role of artificial intelligence, digital transformation, leadership, data protection, and ethical strategies in building more effective and responsible solutions.

Learn More

MUST Reviews

Business
VIEW ALL JOURNALS

MUST Reviews

Education
VIEW ALL JOURNALS

MUST Reviews

Educator
VIEW ALL JOURNALS

MUST Reviews

Healthcare Management
VIEW ALL JOURNALS

MUST Reviews

International Law
VIEW ALL JOURNALS

MUST Reviews

Organizational Psychology
VIEW ALL JOURNALS

CONTACT

If you have any questions, please contact the MUST REVIEWS and MUST EDUCATOR Publications Committee by email: mustreviews@mustedu.com 

INSCRÍBETE AHORA
Phone-alt Icon-whatsapp-1 Envelope

About the magazine

MUST REVIEWS and MUST EDUCATOR are annual publications of MUST UNIVERSITY, which contain intellectual and scientific articles by our faculty and graduate and/or graduate students, who have already had their TCF approved by the evaluation committee, with an A rating, and can also accept invited articles, approved by the Editorial Board of each journal. Articles submitted for publication in MUST REVIEWS and MUST EDUCATOR are analyzed by the Editorial Board of the MUST UNIVERSITY Publications Committee, published in Portuguese, but may eventually be published in English and Spanish.

FREQUENCY

Every 12 months.

MUST-HAVE EDITS FOR REVIEWS

Administration and Business, Education, Health Services, International Law and Organizational Psychology.

ESSENTIAL EDITION FOR EDUCATORS

Edition that includes all areas of the master’s courses at MUST UNIVERSITY.

MUST University Board of Directors

Antonio Carbonari Netto – Founder

Giulianna Carbonari Meneghello – President

Maria Elisa Ehrhardt Carbonari – Vice-President

Renato de Sousa Neto – Chairman of the Board

Fabian Fernandez – Vice President of Academic Affairs

Alexandra Silveira Mastella – Academic Director

José Guilhermo Medina – Director of Administration

Gerardo Javariz – Director of Institutional Effectiveness

Renato Dutra – Director of Information Technology

Xaimar Fernandez – Director of Human Resources

Jeanette Spinal – Dean of Student Services

EDITORIAL BOARD

MUST and MUST Educator Reviews

Regina Clare Monteiro – Editor

Deborah Christina Lopes Costa – Support Editor

Maria Luiza Salzani Fiorini – Publications Committee, PhD.

Scientific Board

Alexandra Silveira Mastella, Ph.D.
 
Maria Elisa Ehrhardt Carbonari, Ph.D.
 
Tatiana dos Santos, Ph.D.
Mônica Parreira Coimbra, Master.
 
Carolina de Oliveira Splendore, Ph.D.
 
Priscila Camile Barioni, Ph.D.

Editorial Committee

Each MUST REVIEWS journal has an editorial board (reviewers and evaluators) composed of professors with PhDs in the specific areas of the respective journal, invited by the coordinator of the MUST UNIVERSITY Master’s courses.

MUST EDUCATOR magazine has an external editorial board, composed of experienced PhD professors recognized in their areas of expertise. Reviewers are invited by the Publications Committee, considering the specific areas of the articles presented, such as: Education, Business, Health, Law and Organizational Psychology.

Graphic Design Project

Gabriel Araujo Moreira

Distribution

Marcelo Porta Capellari

Textual Review

MUST University

EDITORIAL GUIDELINES FOR THE SUBMISSION OF ARTICLES IN MUST UNIVERSITY JOURNALS - MUST Reviews and MUST Educator

01. SHIPPING

Articles for MUST REVIEWS must be submitted exclusively through the link: https://app.pipefy.com/public/form/DfZKnnms  

Articles for the MUST EDUCATOR must be sent only and exclusively through the following link: https://app.pipefy.com/public/form/0R7pPGhr

MUST  UNIVERSITY JOURNALS have an automated process, which begins with the delivery of articles through Pipefy, with a widely disseminated link, for this purpose. Items sent via email will not be accepted. Items that are not submitted through the Pipefy link will not go through evaluation. 

The Pipefy links, as well as the submission period, for each journal will be widely disseminated, with an email forwarded by the Publications Committee to ALL teachers and the same information transmitted to the course coordinators.

The publications committee email is available for questions only.

The article must come without identification and within the TEMPLATE created for this purpose, accompanied by the Author Identification Form and the Statement of Revision and Grammatical Correction.

The article must comply with the standards of the Journal, reported in this document. 

Posts must follow the previously published schedule.

Proposals may be submitted by faculty members and graduate students at MUST UNIVERSITY, provided they have successfully completed their A-rated Final Examination of Completion (TCF) and received approval from the examination committee. Additionally, presentations are welcomed from professors and students enrolled in Stricto Sensu programs at partner universities.

Documents sent outside the period of receipt of the articles, nor those that are not sent by the Pipefy system, will NOT be accepted.

02. BLIND REVIEW (NO IDENTIFICATION)

Articles submitted to MUST REVIEWS and MUST EDUCATOR will be blindly reviewed (without identification) by the Editorial Board of the MUST UNIVERSITY Publications Committee.

Each article will be reviewed by the Editorial Board, presented by the courses and approved by the MUST UNIVERSITY Publications Committee. MUST UNIVERSITY journals reserve the right to publish or not publish an article submitted for this purpose. 

The selection process for the publication follows some guidelines, considering whether its content contributes to the academic and professional communities, as well as whether there is creativity regarding the topic and the theoretical-methodological conduct, to go beyond conventional approaches. 

If the Editorial Board suggests modifications in the structure or content of the articles presented, they will be returned to the authors so that they can make the indicated changes. Thus, after the blind review process and the article with the opinion with the recommendation of “publication with revisions”, the authors will have a period of 5 days to resubmit the corrected version. If the corrections are not considered according to the opinion and/or the revised article is not published within 5 days, the article will be rejected and will not advance to the other editorial phases.

03. DOCUMENTATION TO BE SENT

a) Article without identification of the authors in the official template of the journal.

Non-identification of authors is a mandatory condition for the blind review procedure.

Click here to download the Template of the article.

b) Author identification form.

For proper indication of the credit of the authors of the article, each must correctly submit: full name, title, institutional affiliation, and email address. Each article can have a maximum of three authors, and one of them must have the title of Doctor.

Click here to download the Identification Form Template.

c) Grammar Correction and Revision Statement

Click here to download the Grammar Correction and Revision Statement Template.

d) Record of approval by the examining board (containing the final concept).

Only for MUST REVIEWS (submission by students)

04. PERIOD OF AUTHORIZATION AND REPRODUCTION/PUBLICATION OF THE WORK AND ASSIGNMENT OF ECONOMIC RIGHTS

The submission of manuscripts and other works implies the assignment of copyright to journals, if accepted for publication. If approved, authors must complete the Term of Authorization and Reproduction/Publication of the Work and Assignment of Patrimonial Rights, which will be sent later by the Publications Committee. The absence of the term excludes the article from the MUST Review scientific repository. The authorization period will be sent to the authors AFTER the approval of the article for publication.

05. FORMAT OF THE ARTICLE

Articles must be a minimum of 15 and a maximum of 20 pages (including references).

Articles submitted to MUST REVIEWS and MUST EDUCATOR must meet the standards of the 7th edition of the American Psychological Association [APA].

Structure.

1.- Title. Subtitle (if any).

2.- Limited abstract of 120 words.

3.- Between 3 and 6 keywords.

4.- Summary.

5.- Between 3 and 6 keywords.

6.- Introduction.

7.- Methodology.

8.- Research, development and results.

9.- Final Thoughts.

10.- References and bibliography

06. TECHNICAL STANDARDS

– Originals submitted to MUST REVIEWS and MUST EDUCATOR must be submitted in Word text editor, Times New Roman font, size 11, 1.5 cm space, 3 cm margins and in letter format. They must be accompanied by an abstract with a minimum of 100 and a maximum of 120 words and three keywords, in Portuguese, separated by a period. Below the Portuguese abstract, the abstract must be written in English, followed by three keywords, separated from each other by a period.

– Indirect quotations or paraphrases must be accompanied by the indication of the source, in parentheses, which contains AUTHOR and YEAR. According to MUST UNIVERSITY rules, it is not necessary to indicate a page with indirect citations.

– Direct quotations with more than 40 words must be highlighted, in a single block (without tab), without quotation marks, with font size 12 and indented left margin 1.3 centimeters (equivalent to one inch), with a line space of 1.5 cm. The indication of the source must be in parentheses, which contains AUTHOR, YEAR AND PAGE. Please note that the indication on the page is mandatory for direct quotation. When the text consulted does not have a page number, indicate the acronym n.p., which means not paginated.

– Illustrations are all the non-textual elements used in research to bring clarity to what is presented. Therefore, they are graphs, tables, photos and figures. The title should be above the illustration, centered, with the same font and size as the body text (Times New Roman, size 12). Below the illustrations, the font from which the information is extracted must be indicated, same font, smaller size (Times New Roman, size 10, justified on the left). Sources can be referenced in the following ways: a) when they are taken from bibliographic references. Example: Source: Silva, 2012, p. 24 (note: NO parentheses); b) when adapted from the bibliographic reference. Example: Source: Adapted from Silva, 2012, p. 24; c) when prepared by the author, based on bibliographic reference: Source: Prepared by the author, based on Silva, 2012. Note: In this case, the page indication is optional. If the author’s adaptation was based on another illustration or on specific content by the cited author, the page is indicated. If it was a general adaptation, of a chapter or part of the work, it is not necessary to indicate the page and d) when it is prepared by the author: Source: Prepared by the author. (Note that you don’t need to indicate the year.)

– Articles must be a minimum of 15 and a maximum of 20 pages, including tables, maps, graphs or other images and non-textual information, as well as bibliographic references.

– The Editorial Board informs that articles must contain at least the following sections: 1) introduction, 2) development, 3) final considerations and 4) bibliographic references.

– The format of the bibliographic references of MUST REVIEWS and MUST EDUCATOR follows the APA, that is, the author’s last name, with only the first letter in capital letters, the other names only with the initials, followed by the year of publication, title of the work and other information, depending on where the source has been taken, whether it is from a book,  a published article, online article, or others.

– See examples below:

Examples of bibliographic references that are physical books:

Gil, A. C. (2010) How to develop research projects. Atlas.

Lakatos, E.M. & Marconi, M.A. (2017). Fundamentals of scientific methodology. Atlas.

Examples of bibliographic references taken from electronic media:

Svendsen, S., & Løber, L. (2020). The Overview/Academic Writing: The One-Hour Guide (3rd Digital Edition). Hans Reitzel Forlag. https://thebigpicture-academicwriting.digi.hansreitzel.dk/

Grady, J. S., Her, M., Moreno, G., Perez, C., & Yelinek, J. (2019). Emotions in Stories: A Comparison of Storybooks Representing Racial and Ethnic Groups in the United States. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 8(3), 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000185

Pope, J. P., & Wall, H. (2025). Is the goal intrinsic or extrinsic? Examining the perception of self-determination theory researchers and the general public about exercise goals. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 57(3), 239–248. https://doi.org/10.1037/cbs0000411

– The name of the organizations and entities must be presented in full, followed by their acronym, in the first insertion of the text. Once you have entered the full name of the acronym, you can only use the acronym in the rest of the text. [e.g., United Nations – UN].

– Numbers one through ten must be written in full terms and in foreign terms in italics.

– Since double quotation marks are used to identify short quotation marks (“), it is advisable to use single quotation marks (‘) to highlight a word or expression in quotation marks within the body of the text.